<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>underdog of perfection &#187; Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.room34.com/tags/site/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.room34.com</link>
	<description>a blog on technology, music and geek culture from room34.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bleeding-edge web design, circa 1994</title>
		<link>http://blog.room34.com/archives/573</link>
		<comments>http://blog.room34.com/archives/573#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>room34.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jakob Nielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://room34.com/creative/computers/573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recently-departed (as in left for another company) coworker stopped by my desk on his last day to drop off a backup CD I had burned back in 2001. Today I popped it into the drive to see what curiosities lurked within. I was delighted to discover one of my trademark &#8220;Miscellany&#8221; folders, with a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://blog.room34.com/wp-content/uploads/underdog/1994_microsoft.gif' title='Microsoft&rsquo;s home page in 1994... don&rsquo;t cut yourself!' rel='lightbox'><img src='http://blog.room34.com/wp-content/uploads/underdog/1994_microsoft.thumbnail.gif' alt='Microsof&rsquo;s home page in 1994... don&rsquo;t cut yourself!' class="framed alignright" /></a>A recently-departed (as in left for another company) coworker stopped by my desk on his last day to drop off a backup CD I had burned back in 2001. Today I popped it into the drive to see what curiosities lurked within. I was delighted to discover one of my trademark &#8220;Miscellany&#8221; folders, with a bunch of random stuff in it. Unquestionably the most interesting artifact was a screenshot of Microsoft&#8217;s website, as it appeared in 1994.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m simply at a loss to explain this design. Clearly <del>many</del> <del>most</del> all web designs from that early need to be cut a <em>little</em> slack, and I doubt any of them have truly aged well. But even through that lens, this site is inexplicably hideous.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m certainly not the first person to look back in time and mock this design, of course. But &#8220;usability guru&#8221; Jakob Nielsen used it in an article he wrote back at the time, and it&#8217;s still <a href="http://www.useit.com/papers/1994_web_usability_report.html">lingering on his site</a> with a new introduction written in 1997. (Frighteningly enough, if the conclusion I draw from my brief perusal of the <del>long and boring</del> highly usable article is correct, he&#8217;s actually <em>praising</em> this design.) Personally I think Nielsen&#8217;s views are overrated, and that if he really knew as much about usability as he is supposed to, his website would look a lot different (and he&#8217;d also realize he no longer needs to cater to the bandwidth limitations of those running 28.8 kbps modems &#8212; but I digress; besides, <a href="http://www.grographics.com/usabilitysucks/usesucks.html">these guys</a> rip into him much better than I care to). But it&#8217;s still an interesting look back in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.room34.com/archives/573/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New site design (partially) implemented</title>
		<link>http://blog.room34.com/archives/554</link>
		<comments>http://blog.room34.com/archives/554#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>room34.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Color]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wanted]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://room34.com/blather/554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My guilt over slighting those regrettably still stuck using Internet Explorer 6 finally got the best of me, and I decided to do a new site design that doesn&#8217;t completely break down in that (outdated) browser.
Well, that&#8217;s not really the reason I did it. I wanted to take a new approach that allows for more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guilt over slighting those regrettably still stuck using Internet Explorer 6 finally got the best of me, and I decided to do a new site design that doesn&#8217;t completely break down in that (outdated) browser.</p>
<p>Well, that&#8217;s not really the reason I did it. I wanted to take a new approach that allows for more customization of the presentation in different sections of the site. But I made it IE6-friendly while I was at it. The new design is based on another color scheme called &#8220;Salamander&#8221; that I found at <a href="http://kuler.adobe.com/">Kuler</a>. (Sorry, I&#8217;d link right to the specific color palette but, guess what, it&#8217;s Flash. Boo.)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not finished yet, but I wanted to put the necessary pressure on myself to keep working on it until it&#8217;s completely done. So now that it&#8217;s far enough along to be presentable to the public, I&#8217;m rolling it out.</p>
<p>Most of the cool site-specific graphical headers are still missing, so it&#8217;s falling back to a generic presentation with a nice garish green band at the top. Certain other fine details are also still missing in the CSS, but I&#8217;m getting there.</p>
<p>Eventually there will be more dramatic changes to the page structure: the home page will be more of a &#8220;portal&#8221; than just a dump of the most recent blog posts; different sections of the site will have different content in the sidebar, etc. But this is a start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.room34.com/archives/554/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m afraid to click on that banner ad</title>
		<link>http://blog.room34.com/archives/548</link>
		<comments>http://blog.room34.com/archives/548#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>room34.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Click]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://room34.com/blather/548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I mentioned yesterday, I&#8217;ve joined ReverbNation in a perhaps futile effort to promote my music. I was just having a look at my pages on that site when I was assaulted by the piercing, fearsome visage of some guy named John Anthony. (He&#8217;s probably a much more well-established musician than I am, but I&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://blog.room34.com/wp-content/uploads/underdog/johnanthony.png' title='All hail John Anthony and his passionate rock!'><img src='http://blog.room34.com/wp-content/uploads/underdog/johnanthony.thumbnail.png' alt='All hail John Anthony and his passionate rock!' class="framed alignright" /></a>As I mentioned yesterday, I&#8217;ve joined <a href="http://www.reverbnation.com/room34">ReverbNation</a> in a perhaps futile effort to promote my music. I was just having a look at my pages on that site when I was assaulted by the piercing, fearsome visage of some guy named John Anthony. (He&#8217;s probably a much more well-established musician than I am, but I&#8217;ve never heard of him, so he is therefore &#8220;some guy.&#8221;)</p>
<p>His icy stare is compelling me to <a href="http://www.johnanthonymusic.com/"><strong><em>CLICK THAT LINK</em></strong></a> but no, I will not! I will muster all the will within my soul to do anything other than click that link. Begone, John Anthony! You are almost as terrifying as the <a href="http://futurama.wikia.com/wiki/Hypnotoad">Hypnotoad</a>.</p>
<p>OK, I clicked it.</p>
<p>Wow, he really <em>does</em> sound like Dennis DeYoung. And&#8230; um&#8230; that&#8217;s about all I have to say about that. My only other comment (before I must leave the site in haste, lest I become hypnotized) is that I think he must have stolen away <a href="http://www.paultodd.com/">Paul Todd</a>&#8217;s webmaster. In fact, the Paul Todd similarities seem to go deeper than the bitchin&#8217; website. He really needs an animation that morphs between a photo and cartoon of himself, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.room34.com/archives/548/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Room 34 music now on ReverbNation and SoundClick</title>
		<link>http://blog.room34.com/archives/543</link>
		<comments>http://blog.room34.com/archives/543#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>room34.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Http]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[More room34 Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReverbNation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Set]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SoundClick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Www]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://room34.com/2008/02/19/room-34-music-now-on-reverbnation-and-soundclick/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve recently set up pages on the musician sites ReverbNation and SoundClick. (Basically, these sites are what MySpace was supposed to be, and they don&#8217;t suck.)
I&#8217;m presently working on a major redesign of this site to make it more portal-like and less generic-WordPress-blog-like, and once that&#8217;s in place I&#8217;ll integrate ReverbNation and SoundClick content more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently set up pages on the musician sites ReverbNation and SoundClick. (Basically, these sites are what MySpace was supposed to be, and they don&#8217;t suck.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m presently working on a major redesign of this site to make it more portal-like and less generic-WordPress-blog-like, and once that&#8217;s in place I&#8217;ll integrate ReverbNation and SoundClick content more seamlessly into the site (plus I&#8217;m planning to set up some PayPal-Kunaki integration to handle sales of my CDs directly from this site), but in the meantime, here are the links:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reverbnation.com/room34">http://www.reverbnation.com/room34</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.soundclick.com/room34">http://www.soundclick.com/room34</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.room34.com/archives/543/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still wish you were using Internet Explorer 6?</title>
		<link>http://blog.room34.com/archives/421</link>
		<comments>http://blog.room34.com/archives/421#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 03:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>room34.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://room34.com/2007/12/03/still-wish-you-were-using-internet-explorer-6/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve never visited this site using Internet Explorer 6, you probably are unaware that up until now doing so would load a big ugly alert box explaining how foolish you were being to do so &#8212; being that I am an arrogant Mac and Firefox user, not to mention that IE6 is dangerously insecure [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ve never visited this site using Internet Explorer 6, you probably are unaware that up until now doing so would load a big ugly alert box explaining how foolish you were being to do so &#8212; being that I am an arrogant Mac and Firefox user, not to mention that IE6 is dangerously insecure (besides not supporting alpha channel transparency in PNG images, which are the building blocks of this site&#8217;s design).</p>
<p>Today I had the chance for the first time to see just <em>how</em> horrible the new design looks in IE6, and as much as I don&#8217;t want to support that browser, I also couldn&#8217;t handle thrusting visitors into the hideous mess of this site in IE6 without at least giving them a <em>taste</em> of what it&#8217;s <em>supposed</em> to look like first. To that end, I&#8217;ve created a more friendly &#8220;welcome&#8221; page for IE6 users, giving them one last chance to upgrade before proceeding, and in the process showing them a hint of the site&#8217;s actual design as it&#8217;s intended to appear.</p>
<p>But of course, since you&#8217;re <em>not</em> using IE6 (are you?), you have no idea what that page looks like. So, I thought I&#8217;d show it off a bit. <a href="/room34-ie6.php">Here it is.</a> Enjoy. Or not. Actually, it&#8217;s not really intended to be enjoyed, so don&#8217;t. (I&#8217;m really only posting this link so I can test the HTTP_REFERER link functionality I embedded in it. [And yes, I know the correct spelling is "referrer." Tell that to whoever created the names of the HTTP host headers. I mean <em>whomever.</em> So there.])</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.room34.com/archives/421/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site Redesign</title>
		<link>http://blog.room34.com/archives/394</link>
		<comments>http://blog.room34.com/archives/394#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 17:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>room34.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallery2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implemented]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plug-in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refresh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wonky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://room34.com/2007/11/10/site-redesign-underway/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does this site look completely wonky to you? I&#8217;ve just implemented a new design! Most likely you&#8217;ve got some old files cached. Clear your cache and refresh (or, just refresh about 20 times and your browser will get the hint and clear the cache itself). Of course, you might also be using Internet Explorer 6, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Does this site look completely wonky to you?</strong> I&#8217;ve just implemented a new design! Most likely you&#8217;ve got some old files cached. Clear your cache and refresh (or, just refresh about 20 times and your browser will get the hint and clear the cache itself). Of course, you might also be using Internet Explorer 6, in which case my annoying alert dialog box should have already goaded you into upgrading. If that&#8217;s the case, enough said.</p>
<p><strong>Does this site look a <em>little</em> wonky to you?</strong> In that case, then you are probably a better graphic designer than I and/or you&#8217;ve discovered that the new design isn&#8217;t 100% implemented yet. If I&#8217;m lucky, it&#8217;s the latter. At any rate, I&#8217;ve already spent far more time in the past 24 hours working on this than I&#8217;d have expected to, given the limited extent of the results, but I&#8217;m a little burned out, so I&#8217;ll be finishing a few things (like the background on the footer and a few other little graphical touches) over the next few days. Oh, and I&#8217;ve only done the bare minimum trying to update the &#8220;Offspring&#8221; pages to work with the new look. (It took me about an hour of hunting before I realized/remembered that some of the style settings for the gallery pages are actually in the plug-in settings in WordPress and not in the Gallery2 files at all.) But I am hoping to make the move from Gallery2 to the Dutch Monkey&#8217;s <a href="http://www.dutchmonkey.com/?file=products/dm-albums/dm-albums.html">DM Albums</a> plug-in soon anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.room34.com/archives/394/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site girth expansion</title>
		<link>http://blog.room34.com/archives/373</link>
		<comments>http://blog.room34.com/archives/373#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>room34.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[End]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refresh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://room34.com/2007/10/05/site-girth-expansion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just finished a modification to the site design. I was starting to feel a bit too confined by the narrowness of the old layout, so I&#8217;ve basically kept things intact design-wise, but I&#8217;ve expanded the layout to be more suitable to today&#8217;s 1024&#215;768-or-greater standard screen resolution. I&#8217;ve also bumped up the size of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just finished a modification to the site design. I was starting to feel a bit too confined by the narrowness of the old layout, so I&#8217;ve basically kept things intact design-wise, but I&#8217;ve expanded the layout to be more suitable to today&#8217;s 1024&#215;768-or-greater standard screen resolution. I&#8217;ve also bumped up the size of the type slightly.</p>
<p>The only design element that&#8217;s noticeably different is the little greenish weirdness at the right end of the photos in the header bar. This was something I spent a great deal of time developing for an old, shortlived design that was part of my quickly-abandoned experiment with running the site on <a href="http://www.drupal.org/">Drupal</a>. I may end up getting rid of it again; I just thought it deserved a second chance.</p>
<p>Now then, if you&#8217;ve actually visited this site sometime before, you may find the pages are looking somewhat garbled; sadly that&#8217;s the side effect of keeping a lot of the filenames the same; your browser likely has old versions of these files cached. Hit the Refresh button a few times or perhaps clear your cache. I did the Refresh thing, but I had to hit it about 4 times before <em>all</em> of the files actually updated. Sheesh, you&#8217;d think I was using a Microsoft product or something, not <a href="http://www.getfirefox.com/">Firefox</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.room34.com/archives/373/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where are all of the pictures?</title>
		<link>http://blog.room34.com/archives/269</link>
		<comments>http://blog.room34.com/archives/269#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>room34.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Set]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://room34.com/2007/03/24/where-are-all-of-the-pictures/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know many of you have been waiting patiently (?) for the return of the &#8220;Offspring&#8221; photo galleries. Unfortunately I&#8217;ve been really busy with work (and life)&#8230; and I&#8217;ve been spending most of my &#8220;geek&#8221; time doing music in GarageBand or playing the Wii (i.e. losing to Fletcher at bowling), rather than getting the new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know many of you have been waiting patiently (?) for the return of the &#8220;Offspring&#8221; photo galleries. Unfortunately I&#8217;ve been really busy with work (and life)&#8230; and I&#8217;ve been spending most of my &#8220;geek&#8221; time doing music in GarageBand or playing the <a href="http://wii.com/">Wii</a> (i.e. losing to Fletcher at bowling), rather than getting the new photo gallery stuff set up on the site.</p>
<p>Fortunately for you, we&#8217;ve taken almost no new pictures since Christmas, because a) the camera&#8217;s batteries are crapping out and b) the camera has been misplaced for several weeks. So, you haven&#8217;t missed anything, really.</p>
<p>One of the key points in getting this set up was finding a mechanism in <a href="http://wordpress.org/">WordPress</a> to restrict access: in short, I want to know who&#8217;s looking at pictures of my kids. Now I&#8217;ve found a plug-in to manage access to individual blog posts, so that&#8217;s one more hurdle jumped.</p>
<p>Future posts in this category will require you to be logged in. Fortunately, it&#8217;s easy to <a href="/wp-login.php?action=register">register</a> and once you&#8217;ve done it, you should never have to do it again. (At least, not until I decide to change my site entirely again. But I don&#8217;t anticipate doing that in the near future, if only because I&#8217;m not going to have the time to mess with it!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.room34.com/archives/269/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So what&#8217;s going on here, exactly?</title>
		<link>http://blog.room34.com/archives/189</link>
		<comments>http://blog.room34.com/archives/189#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 10:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>room34.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drupal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good question. I had redesigned my site, in conjunction with a transition to using the Drupal engine. But then I learned just how much of a sitting target for spammers a Drupal site really is, so that&#8217;s out the window.
For now I&#8217;ve rolled back to the old site (with the 3 or 4 blog entries [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question. I had redesigned my site, in conjunction with a transition to using the Drupal engine. But then I learned just how much of a sitting target for spammers a Drupal site really is, so that&#8217;s out the window.</p>
<p>For now I&#8217;ve rolled back to the old site (with the 3 or 4 blog entries I posted in Drupal floating out there in the ether). I&#8217;m in the process of moving everything over to a new server anyway, so for now the site will remain in this old look until I get everything on the new server ready to roll out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.room34.com/archives/189/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A nifty little tool&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.room34.com/archives/139</link>
		<comments>http://blog.room34.com/archives/139#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 11:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>room34.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Color]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For web geeks like me whose design ambitions occasionally outpace our abilities, it&#8217;s always fun to come across tools like this:
Color Palette Generator
Just give it the URL of any image anywhere on the web (such as, for example on your own site) and it generates color palettes for you to use in your design, based [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For web geeks like me whose design ambitions occasionally outpace our abilities, it&#8217;s always fun to come across tools like this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.degraeve.com/color-palette/">Color Palette Generator</a></p>
<p>Just give it the URL of any image anywhere on the web (such as, for example on your own site) and it generates color palettes for you to use in your design, based on the colors in the image.</p>
<p>Look for yet another new Room 34 site redesign in the near (or not-so-near) future using this tool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.room34.com/archives/139/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Political Compass</title>
		<link>http://blog.room34.com/archives/131</link>
		<comments>http://blog.room34.com/archives/131#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>room34.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Led]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some time, I&#8217;ve had my web browser configured with its start page set to the random article link on Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
The effect is that every time I open my browser, a new, random article on Wikipedia loads, which can often be severely distracting (so I make sure not to use this configuration at work!), but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some time, I&#8217;ve had my web browser configured with its start page set to the random article link on Wikipedia:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random</a></p>
<p>The effect is that every time I open my browser, a new, random article on Wikipedia loads, which can often be severely distracting (so I make sure <em>not</em> to use this configuration at work!), but it&#8217;s almost always very interesting.</p>
<p>For instance, today the random link led me to this site: <a href="http://www.politicalcompass.org/">www.politicalcompass.org</a></p>
<p>Despite my skeptical view of questionnaires designed to pigeonhole your identity (think <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers-Briggs_Type_Indicator">Myers-Briggs</a>), I was immediately fascinated with the idea of the political compass, because it addresses a dimension (literally) of political viewpoints that the typical left/right dichotomy completely misses. It acknowledges that the traditional left/right spectrum is primarily (but not entirely) an <em>economic</em> scale, and it adds a second scale for <em>social</em> issues, with extremes it labels &#8220;authoritarian&#8221; and &#8220;libertarian.&#8221; I think the terminology is a bit muddled, since left/right would be better described as liberal/conservative or perhaps socialist/free market, but all of those terms have baggage. (Of course, in the United States, at least, so does &#8220;libertarian,&#8221; and the characteristics of &#8220;libertarianism&#8221; as described on the site are not entirely consistent with the Libertarian Party in the U.S.) Nonetheless, the terms are familiar enough to give a clear picture.</p>
<p>I was not too surprised to see where I ended up on the chart, although I <em>did</em> find it interesting that I was even farther down in the lower-left corner than the likes of Nelson Mandela and the Dalai-Lama!</p>
<p>(On a side note, writing this led me to another topic: the confusion of similar words. In my particular case, it was the old thorn in my side, farther vs. further. Luckily <a href="http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/course/76-451/watts.html">it seems</a> I got it right. And writing the first sentence in this paragraph reminded me of yet another similar word problem: lead vs. led. I&#8217;ve noticed more and more lately, often coming even from respected sources, careless use of the word &#8220;lead&#8221; when in fact the intention was to use &#8220;led&#8221; &#8212; the past-tense of &#8220;lead&#8221; as pronounced &#8220;LEED.&#8221; But I digress [yet again].)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.room34.com/archives/131/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now that&#8217;s just wrong.</title>
		<link>http://blog.room34.com/archives/127</link>
		<comments>http://blog.room34.com/archives/127#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>room34.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdSense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Make]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m trying out Google AdSense on my site for the second time. Although on one hand I feel a bit like a tool (OK, I am a tool, but that&#8217;s beside the point), it is nice to potentially make a little money from these sites (even if it would take approximately 800 years to earn [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying out <a href="http://adsense.google.com/">Google AdSense</a> on my site for the second time. Although on one hand I feel a bit like a tool (OK, I <i>am</i> a tool, but that&#8217;s beside the point), it <i>is</i> nice to potentially make a little money from these sites (even if it would take approximately 800 years to earn enough to pay for one month of hosting&#8230; if I weren&#8217;t getting the hosting for free).</p>
<p>Anyway&#8230; so as I said, I&#8217;m trying out Google AdSense on the site, hence those ugly ad panels in the left columns of all of the pages.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re off to a rocky start, though, and I have previously unexpected doubts over the accuracy of Google&#8217;s algorithms, having discovered that they put ads for nudist/naturist sites on a page of family photos! (And there was nothing of an illicit nature in those photos, I assure you&#8230;)</p>
<p>So, Google, consider yourself on <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077975/quotes">double-secret probation</a>. Don&#8217;t make me sic Marmalard on you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.room34.com/archives/127/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So long, WordPress!</title>
		<link>http://blog.room34.com/archives/100</link>
		<comments>http://blog.room34.com/archives/100#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 11:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>room34.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Else's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, that&#8217;s it. As of last night, the last traces of WordPress on my site are gone.
There&#8217;s nothing really wrong with WordPress; in fact, for what it does it&#8217;s pretty elegant and flexible. But since, let&#8217;s be honest, I&#8217;m a geek, and I&#8217;m more about building my site than actually creating any meaningful content for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s it. As of last night, the last traces of <a href="http://wordpress.org/">WordPress</a> on my site are gone.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing really <em>wrong</em> with WordPress; in fact, for what it does it&#8217;s pretty elegant and flexible. But since, let&#8217;s be honest, I&#8217;m a geek, and I&#8217;m more about building my site than actually creating any meaningful <em>content</em> for it, running it on someone else&#8217;s engine is unsatisfying, and almost feels like cheating.</p>
<p>Besides, WordPress (and probably any other third-party tool) will never do <em>everything</em> I want it to, or at least it won&#8217;t do it precisely in the <em>way</em> I want it to. And it&#8217;s more fun for me to write my own code than to tweak someone else&#8217;s. So here we go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.room34.com/archives/100/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progress&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.room34.com/archives/116</link>
		<comments>http://blog.room34.com/archives/116#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>room34.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Themes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I realized what a daunting task it was going to be to use the built-in WordPress functionality to manually copy over all of the articles from my old site database, so I dug under the hood and used the power of SQL to just more-or-less dump everything from one database into the other. So now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realized what a daunting task it was going to be to use the built-in WordPress functionality to manually copy over all of the articles from my old site database, so I dug under the hood and used the power of SQL to just more-or-less dump everything from one database into the other. So now all (well, most) of the stuff is moved over, and I can begin to disassemble the old site (currently lingering in the link set as &#8220;Room 34 Cold Storage&#8221;).</p>
<p>If you care to look back at the old stuff (and why wouldn&#8217;t you?), you may notice some oddities&#8230; that&#8217;s mainly due to inconsistencies between my idiosyncratic HTML and the fancy formatting/clean-up WordPress does. I&#8217;ll gradually fix that stuff&#8230; maybe. (Right after I get around to organizing the basement.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also tinkering more with the themes. I&#8217;ve downloaded several interesting themes that I plan to try out for a while, to get a feel for both their visual appeal as well as the ways they handle certain technical features of WordPress. Once I find one I like, I&#8217;ll use it as a basis to build my own, one that incorporates my photography as well. (Will the excitement never end?!)</p>
<p>Oh, I almost forgot to mention&#8230; some of the old stuff didn&#8217;t have dates, so I hastily and more-than-somewhat arbitrarily assigned them all to January 1, 2004.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.room34.com/archives/116/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
