<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>underdog of perfection &#187; Daffy Duck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.room34.com/tags/daffy-duck/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.room34.com</link>
	<description>a blog on technology, music and geek culture from room34.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:26:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dog inequality in Walt Disney&#8217;s world</title>
		<link>http://blog.room34.com/archives/2201</link>
		<comments>http://blog.room34.com/archives/2201#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>room34.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellany & Minutiæ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bugs Bunny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daffy Duck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Duck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goofy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Looney Tunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mickey Mouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muppets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pluto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Disney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://room34.com/?p=2201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I would have suspected, I am clearly not the first person who&#8217;s wondered about this. I generally don&#8217;t think too much of Disney cartoons. (Interpret that sentence how you wish.) I appreciate the technical achievement of their older hand-drawn animated features, and I love the Pixar films, but, to paraphrase a political term, those [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.room34.com/wp-content/uploads/underdog/goofy-and-pluto.gif"><img src="http://blog.room34.com/wp-content/uploads/underdog/goofy-and-pluto.gif" alt="" title="Goofy and Pluto" width="300" height="276" class="alignright size-full framed wp-image-2202" /></a>As I would have suspected, I am clearly not the first person who&#8217;s <a href="http://ask.metafilter.com/31890/What-is-the-deal-with-Goofy-and-Pluto">wondered about this</a>.</p>
<p>I generally don&#8217;t think too much of <a href="http://www.disney.com/">Disney</a> cartoons. (Interpret that sentence how you wish.) I appreciate the technical achievement of their older hand-drawn animated features, and I <em>love</em> the <a href="http://www.pixar.com/">Pixar</a> films, but, to paraphrase a political term, those are DINO &#8212; Disney in Name Only.</p>
<p>As a kid I had little interest in Disney. I preferred the sardonic, slightly (and sometimes not-so-slightly) twisted humor of <a href="http://looneytunes.kidswb.com/">Looney Tunes</a> to the ingenuous, wholesome tone of Mickey and friends. But my kids these days are <em>obsessed</em> with <a href="http://atv.disney.go.com/playhouse/mickeymouseclubhouse/index.html">Mickey Mouse Clubhouse</a> on the Disney Channel. (&#8220;Hot dog hot dog hot diggity dog!&#8221; It&#8217;s on right now.)</p>
<p>With this increased exposure to the Disney cartoon characters lately, I am reminded of a particular aspect of these cartoons that has always troubled me. There are two dogs in these cartoons. You&#8217;ve got Goofy. He wears clothes, he walks upright, he talks, and he&#8217;s generally considered an equal and peer to the likes of Mickey, Minnie, Donald, etc. Then you&#8217;ve got Pluto. No clothes, all fours, mute (does he even <em>bark?</em>), pet of Mickey Mouse. (Yes, a mouse with a dog as a pet. What a world!)</p>
<p>I suspect that the problem here is that we&#8217;re talking about characters who were never initially intended to appear together in the same cartoon. Looney Tunes has suffered the same fate in recent times, such as with the abominable <a href="http://blog.room34.com/wp-content/uploads/underdog/babylooneyv2.jpg" rel="lightbox">Baby Looney Tunes</a> (which my kids also like), wherein infantile, diapered (yet surprisingly verbal) incarnations of Bugs, Daffy, Taz, Sylvester, Tweety, and a few other latter-day characters who previously occupied overlapping but distinct cartoon universes now all live in the same house with Granny as their caretaker. It&#8217;s fine if one character bridges these gaps &#8212; Bugs might appear in cartoons with both Daffy and Taz, but not at the same time; Kermit the Frog might appear on both Sesame Street and The Muppet Show, but you&#8217;ll never see Fozzie in a twin bed with an F on the headboard, next to Bert and Ernie.</p>
<p>So really&#8230; maybe it&#8217;s not Walt&#8217;s fault. It&#8217;s probably just a case of latter day marketing &#8220;geniuses&#8221; who&#8217;ve twisted and combined these previously disparate, carefully constructed cartoon worlds into an illogical hodgepodge&#8230; and then thrown in just enough educational content to be able to stick the &#8220;E/I&#8221; badge in the corner of the screen to meet the FCC&#8217;s requirements. (Never mind the fact that cable channels like Disney aren&#8217;t subject to FCC regulation.)</p>
<p>OK, I guess I have no explanation. It just makes no sense. (After all, Pluto has been, since day one, the pet of a much smaller animal.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.room34.com/archives/2201/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
